top of page

DID WE MAKE SCIENCE MATTER?

To help us continue developing the conference and ensure that it remains relevant, inspiring, and valuable in the future, we kindly ask you to take a few minutes to complete a short evaluation.


The evaluation takes approximately 3 minutes to complete — slightly longer if you choose to elaborate on your answers.

​

Thank you very much in advance. Your feedback is important and helps us create an even better Greenland Science Conference in 2027.

Greenland Science Conference 2025 evaluation

1. How did you hear about Greenland Science Conference 2025?

2. Your experience of the Greenland Science Conference

Scale 1–5 (1 = very poor, 5 = excellent)


Scale 1–5 (1 = very poor, 5 = excellent)


Scale 1–5 (1 = very poor, 5 = excellent)


Scale 1–5 (1 = very poor, 5 = excellent)


2.5. In addition to the Greenland Science Conference, which of the following events did you attend during Greenland Science Week?
2.6. To what extent do you agree with the following statement: “Greenland Science Conference is an important platform for researchers and other research stakeholders in Greenland.”
Strongly disagree
Disagree
Neither agree nor disagree
Agree
Strongly agree
2.7. How would you assess the balance between plenary sessions and breakout sessions?
There were too many plenary sessions
There was a good balance
There were too many breakout sessions
Don’t know / not relevant

3. Learning and outcomes

3.2. Did you gain new contacts, networks, or collaboration opportunities?
Yes
No
Don’t know / not relevant

4. Communication & information

4.1. Did you feel that you had access to the information you needed before the conference?
Yes, completely
Yes, partly
No
Don’t know / not relevant
4.2. Did you receive the necessary information in good time?
Yes, completely
Yes, partly
No
Don’t know / not relevant

5. Improvements and future wishes

6. Closing

6.1. Would you participate again in 2027?
Yes
No
Maybe

© 2025 by Greenland Science Week

bottom of page